![]() Clearly - even though the trans character is poorly named - it's possible for positive change to be made now, even with Rowling still in the picture in some capacity - though she didn't directly work on the game. With the right people in the creative office, the Harry Potter franchise could certainly get its second wind. However, there's still much work to be done considering the name they chose to give the character. We're already seeing a bit of this with the Hogwarts Legacy game developers introducing the franchise's first trans character, Sirona Ryan. From the actors to the writers and producers, younger, diverse talent could help take the lackluster representation Rowling wrote and turn the franchise into something that feels all-encompassing and representative of the varying walks of life that enjoy Harry Potter. ![]() could bring on younger, more diverse talent to help modernize the franchise. were to continue with the Harry Potter franchise without Rowling, they could have a better chance at people showing up to see and support the movies because they could do so with a clear conscience, knowing she's not getting a dime. So when you buy Harry Potter merch - including the new Hogwarts Legacy game - not only are you giving money to her you're giving money to someone who's actively funding hateful, harmful practices. One of the big issues with supporting officially licensed Harry Potter merchandise and media now is that Rowling directly profits from this and has said via Twitter rants that she uses her money to fund anti-LGBTQ+ policies in the U.K. does decide to start development on one, the studio could do itself a major favor by cutting Rowling out of the equation. It's hard to predict the future and tell what the turn of a new Harry Potter movie would be like today, and it's also unclear if another movie will even come to fruition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |